I have no idea what I'm trying to say either.

24th July 2014

Post reblogged from love urself with 208,927 notes

bigrnac:

um lmfao yeah i do drugs *snorts oxygen*

Source: ouijasquiji

24th July 2014

Post reblogged from with 5,341 notes

nananervousbreakdance:

silver-bullet-thekilljoy:

My Chemical Romance:

image

image

image

image

Fall Out Boy:

image

image

image

Its your turn Panic! At The Disco.

image

Source: silver-bullet-thekilljoy

24th July 2014

Photo reblogged from Stigma Mortuorum with 74 notes

Tagged: art

Source: omscorpius

24th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from Greatness from small beginnings with 73,039 notes

FINALLY SOMEONE GIFFED THIS

Source: chelseamps

24th July 2014

Post reblogged from TeamRocket4Eva with 253 notes

fartgallery:

can anyone who has ever had a jar of cheese balls please tell me how to stop eating cheese balls

24th July 2014

Photo reblogged from Keep It Ugly with 605 notes

Tagged: Gerard Way

Source: whatgerard

24th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from hell yeah i'm stoked for this lasagna with 146 notes

knifey-moloko:

Bach, Beethoven, Chopin, Mozart & Vivaldi

by azurecorsair

Tagged: aaaaaahhhhhhhhartfanartthis is the bestthe bestever

Source: azurecorsair.deviantart.com

24th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from Super Nerdy Stoner with 1,518 notes

rhamphotheca:

Giving up beef will reduce carbon footprint more than cars

Study shows red meat dwarfs others for environmental impact, using 28 times more land and 11 times water for pork or chicken

by Damian Carrington

Beef’s environmental impact dwarfs that of other meat including chicken and pork, new research reveals, with one expert saying that eating less red meat would be a better way for people to cut carbon emissions than giving up their cars.

The heavy impact on the environment of meat production was known but the research shows a new scale and scope of damage, particularly for beef. The popular red meat requires 28 times more land to produce than pork or chicken, 11 times more water and results in five times more climate-warming emissions. When compared to staples like potatoes, wheat, and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is even more extreme, requiring 160 times more land and producing 11 times more greenhouse gases…

(read more: The Guardian UK)

photos: Shutterstock and Alamy

Tagged: wow dudepork is really shitty10xthat fucking suckslet's just stop eating meat

Source: rhamphotheca

24th July 2014

Video reblogged from Musings of an Average Fan with 100,199 notes

royalblackpirate:

epic-vines:

When tree branches get in my way

Vine by: Logan Paul

How we manage to cram such genius in 6 seconds is beyond me. This is art.

Tagged: omgnice bod bro

Source: epic-vines

24th July 2014

Photoset reblogged from mcr-ierotoroway with 5,022 notes

Tagged: haishort hairhello there

Source: karengillandaily